“Sticks and stones”, say what you want, once it becomes physical, all bets are off. Perez Hilton was assaulted, and no matter what was said before or after the confrontation, getting beat-up should be the focal point. Shockingly, GLAAD turned on one of their own, in their time of need, turning their collective heads to the fact Hilton was “struck” and choosing to beat-on Hilton in the press about something that was “said,” unbelievable.
How GLAAD could even take a stance on the assault, especially on something that was “said” and said by a guy that just got his face punched-in is mind-blowing. Doesn’t GLAAD see that they are indicating, in some way, the beating was justified?
ThecounT.com is here, on the record to bring this issue back to center, Hilton was assaulted, and someone needs to account for that.

















